Advertisement

Food & Beverage Financial Analysis

Colonial Heritage Food & Beverage Financial Analysis

This analysis shows how much each resident is required to pay as a part of their HOA dues to subsidize the Food & Beverage operations here at Colonial Heritage, regardless of whether they personally used these amenities. It’s a recipe for financial discussion that might be hard to digest, but we’ll try to serve it up in clear portions!

A Five-Year Taste of the Financials (2020-2024)

During the past five years, the Food & Beverage operations have cooked up a substantial total deficit of $2,590,128. That’s no small potatoes! This translates to approximately $1,834 that each long-term resident has been required to pay through their HOA dues specifically for F&B subsidies, averaging about $367 per year.

The monthly subsidy has been on quite a financial menu over time:

  • 2020: $44.41 per household monthly ($532.92 annually) – a particularly expensive entrée!
  • 2021: $21.14 per household monthly ($253.66 annually) – prices cooled down a bit
  • 2022: $33.69 per household monthly ($404.01 annually) – costs heated up again
  • 2023: $31.27 per household monthly ($375.16 annually) – staying on the front burner
  • 2024: $22.40 per household monthly ($268.63 annually) – simmering down slightly
  • 2025 Budget: $21.00 per household monthly ($252.00 annually) – a more modest meal plan
[siteorigin_widget class=”SiteOrigin_Widget_Headline_Widget”][/siteorigin_widget]

Projected Twenty-Year Financial Feast

While we only have verified financial data for five years, we can whip up reasonable projections about the twenty-year impact on homeowners:

If the F&B operations continue to operate with deficits similar to the recent five-year average (approximately $518,026 per year), the total 20-year deficit could reach a whopping $10.36 million.

For homeowners, that’s a lot of dough:

  • A resident living in Colonial Heritage for 20 years could expect to pay approximately $7,336 in F&B subsidies (based on the 5-year average of $1,834 × 4).
  • If the 2024 reduced subsidy level ($268.63 annually) were maintained, the 20-year cost would be approximately $5,373 per household.
  • If the 2025 budgeted amount ($252 annually) becomes the new normal, the 20-year cost would be approximately $5,040 per household.
[siteorigin_widget class=”SiteOrigin_Widget_Headline_Widget”][/siteorigin_widget]

Food & Beverage Operations Subsidy Per Household
.

     Year      Annual Deficit    Monthly Per Household    Annual Per Household
2019 $(187,141) $12.80 $153.63
2020 $(635,397) $41.55 $498.55
2021 $(343,506) $21.15 $253.76
2022 $(584,205) $33.69 $404.01
2023 $(558,239) $31.27 $375.16
TOTAL $(2,308,488) $29.09 $349.14

Food for Thought

  1. Non-diners are picking up a substantial portion of the tab for restaurant operations they may never use, with a projected 20-year cost potentially exceeding $7,000 per household. That’s quite the check to split!
  2. The F&B operation has consistently required the largest subsidy among all amenities – taking the biggest bite out of homeowner dues.
  3. The 2020 pandemic year saw the highest losses, but even in “good” years, the operation has failed to break even.
  4. The subsidies have been on a roller-coaster ride, making it difficult to predict future costs. Talk about an unpredictable recipe!
  5. When compared to the golf operations, F&B requires more than double the subsidy – approximately 70% of total amenity subsidies come from F&B operations versus 30% for golf.
  6. Revenue has rebounded strongly since the pandemic, from $371,321 in 2020 to $1,427,642 in 2024, but expenses have risen in proportion, preventing the operation from achieving profitability.
  7. 2021 showed the lowest deficit ($343,202), suggesting there might be a sustainable business model that could reduce the subsidy requirement if implemented consistently.

This P&L is based on the detailed supplemental information from the audited financial statements.

Outsourcing the Food & Beverage Operation

Given the persistent and substantial deficits, perhaps the most financially prudent solution would be to eliminate food service as an HOA-managed function entirely. Alternative approaches could include:

  1. Lease to Local Restaurant Operator: Sub-letting the space to an established local restaurant that already has a successful business model and customer base. This could generate rental income while eliminating operational losses.
  2. National Chain Partnership: Partnering with a national restaurant corporation that has proven systems, purchasing power, and brand recognition to operate in the space.
  3. Hybrid Model: Maintaining limited HOA oversight while contracting operations to a third party with profit-sharing arrangements and performance requirements to ensure resident needs are met.
  4. Co-op or Resident-Owned Model: Converting to a membership-based dining club where those who use the facility pay for its operations directly rather than through HOA subsidies.

These approaches could potentially save homeowners thousands of dollars over time while still preserving dining amenities for those who wish to use them. The community could negotiate terms that ensure certain resident benefits while eliminating the substantial ongoing subsidies that all homeowners currently pay regardless of usage.

No matter how you slice it, the Food & Beverage operation represents a significant long-term financial commitment that Colonial Heritage homeowners make to maintain the dining amenity, regardless of personal usage patterns. It’s certainly given us all a lot to chew on!

[siteorigin_widget class=”SiteOrigin_Widget_Image_Widget”][/siteorigin_widget]

The Secret Sauce?

What might help reduce these substantial subsidies? A few ingredients could be added to the mix:

  1. Menu and pricing strategies that better align with actual costs
  2. Staffing adjustments to reflect demand patterns
  3. More efficient food procurement and inventory management
  4. Enhanced marketing to attract more community participation
  5. Special events that generate higher margins

However, these incremental improvements may not address the fundamental financial challenge. A more transformative approach worth considering: outsourcing operations!

4 comments
Mily Villacis

Is there any action being taken to address to consistent deficit generated by the restaurant? I agree that it should be leased out and residents should not have to cover those deficits by increasing our monthly HOA dues. Food costs keep increasing and this is not going to resolve on its own.

Robert

-Marketing- The CH Restaurant and Grill do NOT appear on Google Maps or Yelp. If the restaurant is open to the public, we need to let the public know that we are here.
-Lease to a national chain- I think that the footprint is too small for a national chain. Note that the former Au Bon Pain building has been empty for five years.

Richard Duncan

I am certainly in favor of maintaining our clubhouse as a dining and banquet facility for our residents and the General Public. In saying this, I believe that we must initiate a monthly food and beverage minimum. The amount of money that it will generate is not the reason I am suggesting a minimum. With about 1,400 homes and over 1 1/2 individuals per home that would be 2100 visitors each month to the restaurant and bar. 2,100 visitors each month making suggestions and comments for improvements. I feel things will significantly improve and cause people to want to dine at the clubhouse. Better food, better service, more profit!

Joseph Bernstein

The backlash this site is getting is just rude and blatantly antisemitic. We the residents have the right to seize control of this establishment & it would be a shame if the people defending this financial blunder were exposed and debanked.

Leave a Reply to Joseph Bernstein Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *